New Visa Waiver Program Rules May Require Social Media History

The Trump administration is considering a significant expansion of the information required from international travelers entering the United States under the Visa Waiver Program. According to a notice released this week by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), visitors from dozens of countries that currently enjoy visa-free entry could soon be asked to provide extensive personal data, including five years of social media activity.

Currently, citizens of 42 countries are eligible to enter the U.S. for business or tourism purposes without obtaining a visa. These travelers can stay for up to 90 days and typically complete the process through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), an online application designed to confirm eligibility and screen for potential security concerns. Under the proposed changes, this process would become more comprehensive and more invasive, reflecting an administration-wide effort to tighten immigration and border controls.

The countries participating in the Visa Waiver Program include many of the United States’ closest allies. In Europe, this group includes the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and several other nations. Elsewhere, countries such as Australia, Israel, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea also enjoy visa-free travel privileges. Travelers from these nations have traditionally faced relatively minimal barriers when visiting the U.S., but the proposed overhaul could dramatically alter that dynamic.

Proposed Changes to ESTA

The DHS notice outlined several new requirements for visa waiver applicants. Among the most notable is the mandate for travelers to submit their social media history covering the previous five years. In addition, applicants would need to provide information about email accounts used over the past decade and detailed personal information about immediate family members, including phone numbers and residential addresses. The administration emphasized that the collection of social media history would be mandatory, signaling a substantial increase in the level of scrutiny for travelers who have previously been able to enter the U.S. with minimal hurdles.

The changes also envision transforming the ESTA process into a primarily mobile-based system. DHS officials stated that the goal is to streamline the submission and review of information, but critics argue that the expanded data requirements could act as a deterrent to travel and create privacy concerns for international visitors.

National Security and Immigration Goals

Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a division of DHS, justified the proposed changes as part of broader national security objectives. The move aligns with an executive order issued by President Trump earlier in the year, which seeks to restrict entry to individuals considered potential threats to U.S. safety. By reviewing travelers’ online activity, communications history, and family connections, CBP officials hope to identify risks that existing procedures may not capture.

This approach is part of a larger, aggressive push by the Trump administration to tighten vetting and screening procedures across the U.S. immigration system. Over the past year, the administration has intensified scrutiny of visa applicants overseas, making the approval process more rigorous. At the same time, individuals already residing in the U.S. who are applying for asylum, green cards, or citizenship have been subject to increased investigative measures, including background checks and examinations of social media use.

Concerns from Critics

While the administration frames these measures as necessary for national security, critics warn they could have significant unintended consequences. Tourism advocates express concern that the requirement to provide five years of social media history and extensive personal data could discourage visitors from traveling to the United States, especially from countries that have historically been among the largest sources of international tourism.

These concerns are particularly timely as the U.S., alongside Canada and Mexico, prepares to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The event is expected to draw millions of international visitors, and any policies perceived as overly invasive could dampen attendance and economic benefits. Critics also question the effectiveness of social media vetting as a tool for identifying security risks, arguing that online activity is an unreliable indicator of potential threats.

The proposed requirements for visa waiver travelers mirror broader trends within the U.S. immigration system. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has increasingly directed officials to examine the social media history of certain immigrant applicants. This includes reviewing posts, affiliations, and online activity for content that could be deemed “anti-American” or otherwise inconsistent with eligibility criteria for legal status.

In addition, USCIS has emphasized more stringent evaluations of applicants’ “good moral character,” a standard used to determine suitability for naturalization. These assessments now include a deeper look at applicants’ conduct, associations, and online presence. The administration frames these measures as a means of ensuring that immigrants granted permanent residency or citizenship share core values and do not pose risks to the United States, but civil liberties groups warn that such policies could lead to invasive monitoring and subjective judgments.

What this could mean

If implemented, the proposed changes to the Visa Waiver Program would represent one of the most significant overhauls of international travel protocols in recent years. The requirement to submit years of social media data, alongside extensive information about family members and prior email accounts, goes far beyond standard identification checks. Advocates for stricter border controls argue that these steps are necessary to protect national security in an era of increasingly sophisticated threats.

However, the measures also raise important questions about privacy, data security, and the balance between security and openness. Travelers may be hesitant to share personal and online information, potentially reducing international visitation. Moreover, the administrative burden of reviewing vast amounts of social media and email data could strain CBP resources and slow the processing of applications.

As the proposal moves through the regulatory review process, including evaluation by the White House Office of Management and Budget, policymakers and stakeholders will need to weigh these competing concerns.

Disclaimer: This article was created with AI assistance and edited by a human for accuracy and clarity.

Read More: Trump Moves Threaten to Shake Up the US Travel Industry